Just when men are reaching the age where they are maturing sexually, around 50 or so, finally understanding women’s bodies and how they work; how to really make love; that women prefer a “slow hand” (as the Pointer Sisters asked for so eloquently twenty years ago) instead of growing up, they’re medicating and regressing. Viagra is making sex worse, not better, and a lot of women wish that men would stop taking it.
Lucinda Watson, who blogs about single life for the over 50 set, posted about the trials of dating men in the Viagra demographic. Though she also writes that WEB MD reports that men under 40 are the fastest growing demographic of Viagra users. Watson blogs: “”Pfizer, the makers of Viagra, state that this is understandable as younger men want their sexual performance to be superior.” Watson warns this is exactly the wrong direction to go in to create better sex and better relationships.
For the record: women are sexual beings and enjoy sex. The challenge here is not that women are asexual, frigid, or that women need to be in love (or even like) to enjoy sex. It’s almost the opposite: much of women’s bodies qualify as erogenous zones– hair, shoulders, back, neck, and contrary to popular belief, breasts. Breasts are not in fact, purely decorative, only around for visual pleasure of men (or feeding of babies.) Breasts are secondary sex characteristics, and exist in part for the sensory pleasure of women.
While men’s erections are slowing down (or even before that happens if they’re smart) it would be great if they tried to become less genital/ intercourse/ self focused. It’s an opportunity for sex to get more incredible, rather than taking a little blue pill to transform themselves back into the not-so-great penis/ intercourse/ self focused teenagers they always were.
fsk9C2 http://gdjI3b7VaWpU1m0dGpvjRrcu9Fk.com
As far as posts on feminist blogs go, this one is about as close as I’ve ever seen one come to saying “men are just fine the way they are” — but of course, it doesn’t cross that line.
Maybe if that sentiment were to be stated a bit more often, right out in the open, there wouldn’t be quite so many men jumping the gun to change themselves. But as it is, it seems there’s always some deficiency being complained-about, so you really can’t blame the fellas for trying to improve themselves. If it’s really a problem, then perhaps it’s time to try the honey-over-vinegar approach. Could that be within the abilities of feminists? Would they allow each other to contemplate it?